So, here is
another classic from the science fiction genre, probably the movie genre with
the most potential as it comes to creativity and visuals. In my opinion the
infinite possibilities for writers have led to some awesome films, for instance
Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey has
been and still is in my personal top 10 for years, Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner is coming close. But I feel
there are a lot of disappointing ‘classics’ as well. One of the biggest
problems I have with some scifi’s is that filmmakers tend to overdo their ‘gimmick’,
they sometimes seem to forget how to tell their story properly and put all the
effort in action, special effect and visuals. This is exactly my problem with
Steven Lisberger’s TRON.
The story in
its core sounds interesting. Computer programmer Flynn (Jeff Bridges) lost his
job because one of his colleagues Dillinger (David Warner) stole the games he
wrote and is now the president of a software engineering firm called ENCOM. This
information is stored in the mainframe computer, which he tries to hack. This
computer is protected by an artificial intelligence called MCP (Master Control
Program, not as creative as HAL, IBM alphabetically 1 letter shifted). When
Dillinger finds out this MCP wants to hack and gain control of the Kremlin and
Pentagon it blackmails Dillinger to reveal his plagiarism. When Flynn breaks in
at ENCOM to hack the MCP he gets sucked in the computer mainframe entering a
virtual reality and has to find his way in the digital world to beat Dillinger,
who is in control, to get his recognition regarding the popular video games.
As I
mentioned earlier, the SF genre has a lot of possibilities in a lot of
different fields. Think about time travel, space travel, aliens, future
prospects etc. I am generally a big fan of the type of SF where one or a few
details have been changed or are different compared to our conventional world
and that are told properly in a ‘conventional’ real-world film (Donnie Darko, Primer or Brazil). Films like Star Wars, Star Trek of Serenity
are usually too ‘chaotic’ for me, there is simply too much going on or possible
to keep me fascinated (I admit that I do like the old Star Wars, especially The
Empire Strikes Back). Like I said I have the same problem with TRON, it started off promising but in
the second half when we have entered a new virtual world there is so much going
on that I lost interest.
Suspense,
mystery combined with emotional thrills and involvement are in general some of
the key ingredients that keep a good story going. Elements which the great
directors master to integrate adequately in their films. In the SF films I
qualified earlier as being too chaotic I meant that they are chaotic in the sense
that the story doesn’t seem to be the most important element of the film.
Especially when characters are having special skills of which I am not aware I
can get really annoyed since it often breaks the coherence and puzzle element of a
good story.
Director
Lisberger clearly focuses on his visual imagery and I guess it is mind-blowing
for the early eighties, but at the same time he proves not to be a great storyteller
and fails to create a coherent suspenseful story (for me at least). The message
he tries to tell us has been done before and much, much better (Kubrick). I
will not go as far as to say it is a bad film, therefore it is too unique and
visionary in its animated imagery but TRON
is definitely not my cup of tea.
5.5/10
Schoenmaker , blijf bij je leest. Hou je niet van echte SF, blijf er dan ook af, anders krijg je dit soort recensies. TRON is en blijft baanbrekend voor iedere liefhebber van SF in de breedste zin, dat wil zeggen met alle toeters en bellen die de George Lucassen van deze wereld bedachten, en games als Mass Effect vervoltooiden. TRON was cruciaal in die ontwikkeling.
ReplyDeleteJa, dat ontken ik ook niet, daarom geef ik de film ook geen onvoldoende. Feit is dat SF liefhebber of niet, dat deze film gewoon niet erg goed zijn verhaal uit de doeken doet, maar teveel de focus legt om het visuele (baanbrekende) aspect. Een film is mijns inziens meer dan visuals. Matige uitwerking, er is genoeg 'echte' SF waar dit veel beter gedaan is.
Delete